|


Youngs
Literal Translation
King
James Version
The 1599
Geneva
Study Bible
American Standard ASV-1901
Historical Book
Flavius Josephus
Philip Schaff
History
of the
Christian Church
8 Vol.
Keil & Delitzsch
OT Commentary
|
|
What We Believe
-
Sola Scriptura: The
Scripture Alone is the Standard
-
Soli Deo Gloria: For the
Glory of God Alone
-
Solo Christo: By Christ's
Work Alone are We Saved
-
Sola Gratia: Salvation by
Grace Alone
-
Sola Fide: Justification by
Faith Alone
|
World Without End Ministry
P.O. Box 177
Cagayan de Oro
Central Post Office
Cagayan de Oro 9000
Mindanao, Philippines |
 |
|
"It is enough for good
people to do nothing, for evil people to succeed."
12 Little Things Every Filipino Can Do To Help Our Country
by Alexander L. Lacson
Keil & Delitzsch
Commentary on the Old Testament
(Genesis 13)
Gen 13:1-4 -
Abram, having returned from Egypt to the south of
Canaan with his wife and property uninjured, through the gracious
protection of God, proceeded with Lot
לְמַסָּעָיו “according to his journeys”
(lit., with the repeated breaking up of his camp, required by a nomad
life; on
נָסַע
to break up a tent, to remove, see
Exo_12:37) into the neighbourhood of Bethel
and Ai, where he had previously encamped and built an altar (Gen_12:8),
that he might there call upon the name of the Lord again. That
וַיּקְרָא
(Gen_13:4)
is not a continuation of the relative clause, but a resumption of the main
sentence, and therefore corresponds with
וַיֵּלֶךְ
(Gen_13:3),
“he went...and called upon the name of the Lord there,” has been
correctly concluded by Delitzsch from the repetition of the subject
Abram.
Gen 13:5-7 -
But as Abram was very rich ( כָּבֵד,
lit., weighty) in possessions (מִקְנֶה,
cattle and slaves), and Lot also had flocks, and herds, and tents
אֹהָלִים
for
אָהֳלִים, Ges. §93, 6, 3) for his men, of
whom there must have been many therefore, the land did not bear them
when dwelling together (נָשָׁא,
masculine at the commencement of the sentence, as is often the case
when the verb precedes the subject, vid., Ges. §147), i.e., the
land did not furnish space enough for the numerous herd to graze.
Consequently disputes arose between the two parties of herdsmen. The
difficulty was increased by the fact that the Canaanites and Perizzites
were then dwelling in the land, so that the space was very contracted. The
Perizzites, who are mentioned here and in
Gen_34:30;
Jdg_1:4,
along with the Canaanites, and who are placed in the other lists of the
inhabitants of Canaan among the different Canaanitish tribes (Gen_15:20;
Exo_3:8,
Exo_3:17,
etc.), are not mentioned among the descendants of Canaan (Gen_10:15-17),
and may therefore, like the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, and Rephaim (Gen_15:19-21),
not have been descendants of Ham at all. The common explanation of the
name Perizzite as equivalent to
פְּרָזֹות
אֶרֶץ
ישֵׁב
“inhabitant of the level ground” (Eze_38:11),
is at variance not only with the form of the word, the inhabitant of the
level ground being called
הַפְּרָזִי
(Deu_3:5),
but with the fact of their combination sometimes with the Canaanites,
sometimes with the other tribes of Canaan, whose names were derived from
their founders. Moreover, to explain the term “Canaanite,” as denoting
“the civilised inhabitants of towns,” or “the trading Phoenicians,” is
just as arbitrary as if we were to regard the Kenites, Kenizzites, and the
other tribes mentioned Gen_15:19.
along with the Canaanites, as all alike traders or inhabitants of towns.
The origin of the name Perizzite is involved in obscurity, like that of
the Kenites and other tribes settled in Canaan that were not descended
from Ham. But we may infer from the frequency with which they are
mentioned in connection with the Hamitic inhabitants of Canaan, that they
were widely dispersed among the latter. Vid.,
Gen_15:19-21.
Gen 13:8-9 -
To put an end to the strife between their herdsmen,
Abram proposed to Lot that they should separate, as strife was unseemly
between
אַחִים
אֲנָשִׁים,
men who stood in the relation of brethren, and left him to choose his
ground. “If thou to the left, I will turn to the right; and if thou to
the right, I will turn to the left.” Although Abram was the older, and
the leader of the company, he was magnanimous enough to leave the choice
to his nephew, who was the younger, in the confident assurance that the
Lord would so direct the decision, that His promise would be fulfilled.
Gen 13:10-13 -
Lot chose what was apparently the best portion of the
land, the whole district of the Jordan, or the valley on both sides of the
Jordan from the Lake of Gennesareth to what was then the vale of Siddim.
For previous to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, this whole country
was well watered, “as the garden of Jehovah,” the garden planted by
Jehovah in paradise, and “as Egypt,” the land rendered so
fertile by the overflowing of the Nile, “in the direction of Zoar.”
Abram therefore remained in the land of Canaan, whilst Lot settled in the
cities of the plain of the Jordan, and tented (pitched his tents) as far
as Sodom. In anticipation of the succeeding history (Gen 19), it is
mentioned here ( Gen_13:13),
that the inhabitants of Sodom were very wicked, and sinful before
Jehovah.
Gen 13:14-18 -
After Lot's departure, Jehovah repeated to Abram
(by a mental, inward assurance, as we may infer from the fact that
אָמַר
“said” is not accompanied by
וַיֵּרָא
“he appeared”) His promise that He would give the land to him and to his
seed in its whole extent, northward, and southward, and eastward, and
westward, and would make his seed innumerable like the dust of the earth.
From this we may see that the separation of Lot was in accordance with the
will of God, as Lot had no share in the promise of God; though God
afterwards saved him from destruction for Abram's sake. The possession of
the land is promised
עֹולָם
עַד
“for ever.” The promise of God is unchangeable. As the seed of
Abraham was to exist before God for ever, so Canaan was to be its
everlasting possession. But this applied not to the lineal posterity of
Abram, to his seed according to the flesh, but to the true spiritual seed,
which embraced the promise in faith, and held it in a pure believing
heart. The promise, therefore, neither precluded the expulsion of the
unbelieving seed from the land of Canaan, nor guarantees to existing Jews
a return to the earthly Palestine after their conversion to Christ. For as
Calvin justly says, “quam terra in saeculum promittitur, non
simpliciter notatur perpetuitas; sed quae finem accepit in Christo.”
Through Christ the promise has been exalted from its temporal form to its
true essence; through Him the whole earth becomes Canaan (vid.,
Gen_17:8).
That Abram might appropriate this renewed and now more fully expanded
promise, Jehovah directed him to walk through the land in the
length of it and the breadth of it. In doing this he came in his “tenting,”
i.e., his wandering through the land, to Hebron, where he settled by the
terebinth of the Amorite Mamre (Gen_14:13),
and built an altar to Jehovah. The term
ישֵׁב
(set himself, settled down, sat, dwelt) denotes that Abram made this place
the central point of his subsequent stay in Canaan (cf.
Gen_14:13;
Gen_18:1,
and Gen 23). On Hebron, see
Gen_23:2.
[Home]
[Keil & Delitzsch]
|
Bethel Missionary Baptist:
The name Bethel comes from the Hebrew beth,
meaning house,
and el, meaning God. Bethel means "The House of
God."
Church in the Philippines |
|