Eph 3 :21 Unto him be glory in the Church
by Christ Jesus throughout all ages
World Without End Amen

"Hope deferred maketh the heart sick, but when the desire cometh, it is a tree of life."
Proverbs 13:12

WWEM LIVE in the Philippines

 

- UPDATES -

Study Material

Fulfilled! Magazine

Mission The Audio Library

Sermon A - Z

 

Youngs Literal Translation

King James Version

The 1599 Geneva
Study Bible

American Standard ASV-1901

Historical Book
Flavius Josephus

Philip Schaff
History of the
Christian Church
8 Vol.

Keil & Delitzsch
OT Commentary

Site Meter

What We Believe

  • Sola Scriptura: The Scripture Alone is the Standard

  • Soli Deo Gloria: For the Glory of God Alone

  • Solo Christo: By Christ's Work Alone are We Saved

  • Sola Gratia: Salvation by Grace Alone

  • Sola Fide: Justification by Faith Alone

World Without End Ministry
P.O. Box 177
Cagayan de Oro
Central Post Office
Cagayan de Oro 9000
Mindanao, Philippines

"It is enough for good people to do nothing, for evil people to succeed."
12 Little Things Every Filipino Can Do To Help Our Country
by Alexander L. Lacson

Keil & Delitzsch
Commentary on the Old Testament

(Genesis 13)

Gen 13:1-4 -

Abram, having returned from Egypt to the south of Canaan with his wife and property uninjured, through the gracious protection of God, proceeded with Lot לְמַסָּעָיוaccording to his journeys” (lit., with the repeated breaking up of his camp, required by a nomad life; on נָסַע to break up a tent, to remove, see Exo_12:37) into the neighbourhood of Bethel and Ai, where he had previously encamped and built an altar (Gen_12:8), that he might there call upon the name of the Lord again. That וַיּקְרָא (Gen_13:4) is not a continuation of the relative clause, but a resumption of the main sentence, and therefore corresponds with וַיֵּלֶךְ (Gen_13:3), “he went...and called upon the name of the Lord there,” has been correctly concluded by Delitzsch from the repetition of the subject Abram.

Gen 13:5-7 -

But as Abram was very rich (כָּבֵד, lit., weighty) in possessions (מִקְנֶה, cattle and slaves), and Lot also had flocks, and herds, and tents אֹהָלִים for אָהֳלִים, Ges. §93, 6, 3) for his men, of whom there must have been many therefore, the land did not bear them when dwelling together (נָשָׁא, masculine at the commencement of the sentence, as is often the case when the verb precedes the subject, vid., Ges. §147), i.e., the land did not furnish space enough for the numerous herd to graze. Consequently disputes arose between the two parties of herdsmen. The difficulty was increased by the fact that the Canaanites and Perizzites were then dwelling in the land, so that the space was very contracted. The Perizzites, who are mentioned here and in Gen_34:30; Jdg_1:4, along with the Canaanites, and who are placed in the other lists of the inhabitants of Canaan among the different Canaanitish tribes (Gen_15:20; Exo_3:8, Exo_3:17, etc.), are not mentioned among the descendants of Canaan (Gen_10:15-17), and may therefore, like the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, and Rephaim (Gen_15:19-21), not have been descendants of Ham at all. The common explanation of the name Perizzite as equivalent to פְּרָזֹות אֶרֶץ ישֵׁב “inhabitant of the level ground” (Eze_38:11), is at variance not only with the form of the word, the inhabitant of the level ground being called הַפְּרָזִי (Deu_3:5), but with the fact of their combination sometimes with the Canaanites, sometimes with the other tribes of Canaan, whose names were derived from their founders. Moreover, to explain the term “Canaanite,” as denoting “the civilised inhabitants of towns,” or “the trading Phoenicians,” is just as arbitrary as if we were to regard the Kenites, Kenizzites, and the other tribes mentioned Gen_15:19. along with the Canaanites, as all alike traders or inhabitants of towns. The origin of the name Perizzite is involved in obscurity, like that of the Kenites and other tribes settled in Canaan that were not descended from Ham. But we may infer from the frequency with which they are mentioned in connection with the Hamitic inhabitants of Canaan, that they were widely dispersed among the latter. Vid., Gen_15:19-21.

Gen 13:8-9 -

To put an end to the strife between their herdsmen, Abram proposed to Lot that they should separate, as strife was unseemly between אַחִים אֲנָשִׁים, men who stood in the relation of brethren, and left him to choose his ground. “If thou to the left, I will turn to the right; and if thou to the right, I will turn to the left.” Although Abram was the older, and the leader of the company, he was magnanimous enough to leave the choice to his nephew, who was the younger, in the confident assurance that the Lord would so direct the decision, that His promise would be fulfilled.

Gen 13:10-13 -

Lot chose what was apparently the best portion of the land, the whole district of the Jordan, or the valley on both sides of the Jordan from the Lake of Gennesareth to what was then the vale of Siddim. For previous to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, this whole country was well watered, “as the garden of Jehovah,” the garden planted by Jehovah in paradise, and “as Egypt,” the land rendered so fertile by the overflowing of the Nile, “in the direction of Zoar.” Abram therefore remained in the land of Canaan, whilst Lot settled in the cities of the plain of the Jordan, and tented (pitched his tents) as far as Sodom. In anticipation of the succeeding history (Gen 19), it is mentioned here (Gen_13:13), that the inhabitants of Sodom were very wicked, and sinful before Jehovah.

Gen 13:14-18 -

After Lot's departure, Jehovah repeated to Abram (by a mental, inward assurance, as we may infer from the fact that אָמַר “said” is not accompanied by וַיֵּרָא “he appeared”) His promise that He would give the land to him and to his seed in its whole extent, northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward, and would make his seed innumerable like the dust of the earth. From this we may see that the separation of Lot was in accordance with the will of God, as Lot had no share in the promise of God; though God afterwards saved him from destruction for Abram's sake. The possession of the land is promised עֹולָם עַדfor ever.” The promise of God is unchangeable. As the seed of Abraham was to exist before God for ever, so Canaan was to be its everlasting possession. But this applied not to the lineal posterity of Abram, to his seed according to the flesh, but to the true spiritual seed, which embraced the promise in faith, and held it in a pure believing heart. The promise, therefore, neither precluded the expulsion of the unbelieving seed from the land of Canaan, nor guarantees to existing Jews a return to the earthly Palestine after their conversion to Christ. For as Calvin justly says, “quam terra in saeculum promittitur, non simpliciter notatur perpetuitas; sed quae finem accepit in Christo.” Through Christ the promise has been exalted from its temporal form to its true essence; through Him the whole earth becomes Canaan (vid., Gen_17:8). That Abram might appropriate this renewed and now more fully expanded promise, Jehovah directed him to walk through the land in the length of it and the breadth of it. In doing this he came in his “tenting,” i.e., his wandering through the land, to Hebron, where he settled by the terebinth of the Amorite Mamre (Gen_14:13), and built an altar to Jehovah. The term ישֵׁב (set himself, settled down, sat, dwelt) denotes that Abram made this place the central point of his subsequent stay in Canaan (cf. Gen_14:13; Gen_18:1, and Gen 23). On Hebron, see Gen_23:2.

 

[Home] [Keil & Delitzsch]

 

 


Bethel Missionary Baptist:
The name Bethel comes from the Hebrew beth, meaning house,
and el, meaning God. Bethel means "The House of God."
Church in the Philippines

 


Copyright © 2006 World Without End HOME | AUDIOS | BOOKS