|


Youngs
Literal Translation
King
James Version
The 1599
Geneva
Study Bible
American Standard ASV-1901
Historical Book
Flavius Josephus
|
|
What We Believe
-
Sola Scriptura: The
Scripture Alone is the Standard
-
Soli Deo Gloria: For the
Glory of God Alone
-
Solo Christo: By Christ's
Work Alone are We Saved
-
Sola Gratia: Salvation by
Grace Alone
-
Sola Fide: Justification by
Faith Alone
|
World Without End Ministry
P.O. Box 177
Cagayan de Oro
Central Post Office
Cagayan de Oro 9000
Mindanao, Philippines |
 |
|
"It is enough for good
people to do nothing, for evil people to succeed."
12 Little Things Every Filipino Can Do To Help Our Country
by Alexander L. Lacson
Thoroughly Unmodern
Thomas Jefferson
by Gary DeMar
9/25/2007
The modern-day image of
Thomas Jefferson as a social and political liberal would be
shattered after a single reading of his Bill for Proportioning
Crimes and Punishments. Capital punishment is maintained for murder
and treason while rescinded for all other crimes. Even so, other crimes
receive some rather harsh and politically incorrect penalties. Consider
these examples:
-
“If any person commit petty treason, or a husband
murder his wife, a parent his child, or a child his parent, he shall
suffer death, by hanging, and his body be delivered to Anatomists to
be dissected” (Sec. IV).
-
“Whosoever committith murder by poisoning, shall
suffer death by poison” (Sec. V).
-
“Whosoever shall be guilty of rape, polygamy,
or sodomy with man or woman, shall be punished; if a man, by
castration, a woman, by boring through the cartilage of her nose a
hole of one half inch in diameter at the least” (Sec. XIV).
-
“Whosoever committith a robbery, shall be condemned
to hard labour four years in the public works, and shall make double
reparation to the persons injured” (Sec. XX).
-
“All attempts to delude the people, or to abuse
their understanding by exercise of the pretended arts of witchcraft,
conjuration, enchantment, or sorcery, or by pretended prophecies,
shall be punished by ducking and whipping, at the discretion of a
jury, not exceeding fifteen stripes” (Sec. XXIX).
Modern-day anti-religionists like Alan Dershowitz
often turns to “his idol”1
Thomas Jefferson, a modern born out of time, as an example of
someone who valued reason over revelation long before it was acceptable.
The following comments appeared in Publisher’s Weekly in a
review of Dershowitz’s America Declares Independence:
Dershowitz focuses mainly on
Thomas Jefferson, showing that the Declaration’s principal
author thought most of the Bible was superstitious drivel: he did not
believe in miracles, the devil or anything in the Gospels except that
certain words were spoken by
Jesus.
Rather, Jefferson believed in a deistic God, who set the world in
motion and then went on vacation. Jefferson didn’t think religion
should have anything to do with politics.
Dershowitz and his fellow anti-theists are under the
strange delusion that the rejection of God’s law as revealed in
Scripture will move a society to accept a more reasonable moral
code. Law is an inescapable concept, and any proposed law will be
objected to by many who consider any new set of laws to be draconian or
unreasonable because these laws inhibit their chosen freedoms. Since
there is no transcendental reference point, Jefferson’s proposed laws
are as equally valid as anyone else’s proposed laws. Those in power get
to make the rules, and their rules are just and right by definition. Who
could say otherwise? A larger majority or someone with a bigger stick
who can offer better reasons for their choice of law could easily and
rightly supplant any existing moral code.
In the final analysis, any law that does not have God
as the fixed reference point is involved in a battle of “Says you!”

|