|
|
"It is enough for good people to do
nothing, for evil people to succeed."
“In questions of power, then, let no more be said of confidence in
man,
but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”
|
|
|
|
Why Israel won't survive
Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 19
January 2009

From a hill
just outside the Gaza Strip, Israelis watch the
air assaults on Gaza and dance in celebration of
the attacks, 8 January 2009. (Newscom)
The merciless Israeli bombardment of Gaza has
stopped -- for now -- but the death toll keeps
rising as more bodies are pulled from carpet-
bombed neighborhoods.
What Israel perpetrated in Gaza, starting at
11:30am on 27 December 2008, will remain forever
engraved in history and memory. Tel al-Hawa,
Hayy al-Zeitoun, Khuzaa and other sites of
Israeli massacres will join a long mournful list
that includes Deir Yasin, Qibya, Kufr Qasim,
Sabra and Shatila, Qana, and Jenin.
Once again, Israel demonstrated that it
possesses the power and the lack of moral
restraint necessary to commit atrocities against
a population of destitute refugees it has caged
and starved.
The dehumanization and demonization of
Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims has escalated to
the point where Israel can with full
self-righteousness bomb their homes, places of
worship, schools, universities, factories,
fishing boats, police stations -- in short
everything that sustains civilized and orderly
life -- and claim it is conducting a war against
terrorism.
Yet paradoxically, it is Israel as a Zionist
state, not Palestine or the Palestinian people,
that cannot survive this attempted genocide.
Israel's "war" was not about rockets -- they
served the same role in its narrative as the
non-existent weapons of mass destruction did as
the pretext for the American-led invasion and
occupation of Iraq.
Israel's real goals were to restore its
"deterrence" fatally damaged after its 2006
defeat in Lebanon (translation: its ability to
massacre and terrorize entire populations into
submission) and to destroy any Palestinian
resistance to total Israeli-Jewish control over
historic Palestine from the Jordan River to the
Mediterranean Sea.
With Hamas and other resistance factions removed
or fatally weakened, Israel hoped the way would
be clear to sign a "peace" deal with chief
Palestinian collaborator Mahmoud Abbas to manage
Palestinians on Israel's behalf until they could
be forced out once and for all.
The US-backed "moderate" dictatorships and
absolute monarchies led by Egypt and Saudi
Arabia supported the Israeli plan hoping to
demonstrate to their own people that resistance
-- whether against Israel or their own bankrupt
regimes -- was futile.
To win, Israel had to break Palestinian
resistance. It failed. On the contrary, it
galvanized and unified Palestinians like never
before. All factions united and fought
heroically for 23 days. According to
well-informed and credible sources Israel did
little harm to the modest but determined
military capacity of the resistance. So instead
Israel did what it does best: it massacred
civilians in the hope that the population would
turn against those fighting the occupier.
Israel not only unified the resistance factions
in Gaza; its brutality rallied all Palestinians
and Arabs.
It is often claimed that Arab regimes whip up
anti-Israel anger to distract their populations
from their own failings. Actually, Israel, the
US and subservient Arab regimes tried everything
-- especially demonizing Iran and inciting
sectarian tensions between Sunni and Shia
Muslims -- to distract their populations from
Palestine.
All this failed as millions of people across the
region marched in support of Palestinian
resistance, and the Arab regimes who hoped to
benefit from the slaughter in Gaza have been
exposed as partners in the Israeli atrocities.
In popular esteem, Hamas and other Palestinian
resistance factions earned their place alongside
Hizballah as effective bulwarks against Israeli
and Western colonialism.
If there was ever a moment when the peoples of
the region would accept Israel as a Zionist
state in their midst, that has passed forever.
But anyone surveying the catastrophe in Gaza --
the mass destruction, the death toll of more
than 100 Palestinians for every Israeli, the
thousands of sadistic injuries -- would surely
conclude that Palestinians could never overcome
Israel and resistance is a delusion at best.
True, in terms of ability to murder and destroy,
Israel is unmatched. But Israel's problem is
not, as its propaganda insists, "terrorism" to
be defeated by sufficient application of high
explosives. Its problem is legitimacy, or rather
a profound and irreversible lack of it. Israel
simply cannot bomb its way to legitimacy.
Israel was founded as a "Jewish state" through
the ethnic cleansing of Palestine's non-Jewish
majority Arab population. It has been maintained
in existence only through Western support and
constant use of violence to prevent the
surviving indigenous population from exercising
political rights within the country, or
returning from forced exile.
Despite this, today, 50 percent of the people
living under Israeli rule in historic Palestine
(Israel, the West Bank and Gaza Strip) are
Palestinians, not Jews. And their numbers are
growing rapidly. Like Nationalists in Northern
Ireland or non-whites in South Africa,
Palestinians will never recognize the "right" of
a settler-colonial society to maintain an
ethnocractic state at their expense through
violence, repression and racism.
For years, the goal of the so-called peace
process was to normalize Israel as a "Jewish
state" and gain Palestinians' blessing for their
own dispossession and subjugation. When this
failed, Israel tried "disengagement" in Gaza --
essentially a ruse to convince the rest of the
world that the 1.5 million Palestinians caged in
there should no longer be counted as part of the
population. They were in Israel's definition a
"hostile entity."
In his notorious May 2004 interview with The
Jerusalem Post, Arnon Soffer, an architect of
the 2005 disengagement explained that the
approach "doesn't guarantee 'peace,' it
guarantees a Jewish- Zionist state with an
overwhelming majority of Jews." Soffer predicted
that in the future "when 2.5 million people live
in a closed-off Gaza, it's going to be a human
catastrophe. Those people will become even
bigger animals than they are today, with the aid
of an insane fundamentalist Islam. The pressure
at the border will be awful."
He was unambiguous about what Israel would have
to do to maintain this status quo: "If we want
to remain alive, we will have to kill and kill
and kill. All day, every day." Soffer hoped that
eventually, Palestinians would give up and leave
Gaza altogether.
Through their resistance, steadfastness and
sacrifice, Palestinians in Gaza have defeated
this policy and reasserted that they are an
inseparable part of Palestine, its people, its
history and its future.
Israel is not the first settler-colonial entity
to find itself in this position. When F.W. de
Klerk, South Africa's last apartheid president,
came to office in 1989, his generals calculated
that solely with the overwhelming military force
at their disposal, they could keep the regime in
power for at least a decade. The casualties,
however, would have run into hundreds of
thousands, and South Africa would face ever
greater isolation. Confronted with this reality,
de Klerk took the decision to begin an orderly
dismantling of apartheid.
What choice will Israel make? In the absence of
any political and moral legitimacy the only
arguments it has left are bullets and bombs.
Left to its own devices Israel will certainly
keep trying -- as it has for sixty years -- to
massacre Palestinians into submission. Israel's
achievement has been to make South Africa's
apartheid leaders look wise, restrained and
humane by comparison.
But what prevented South Africa's white
supremacist government from escalating their own
violence to Israeli levels of cruelty and
audacity was not that they had greater scruples
than the Zionist regime. It was recognition that
they alone could not stand against a global
anti-apartheid movement that was in solidarity
with the internal resistance.
Israel's "military deterrent" has now been
repeatedly discredited as a means to force
Palestinians and other Arabs to accept Zionist
supremacy as inevitable and permanent. Now, the
other pillar of Israeli power -- Western support
and complicity -- is starting to crack. We must
do all we can to push it over.
Israel began its massacres with full support
from its Western "friends." Then something
amazing happened. Despite the official
statements of support, despite the media
censorship, despite the slick Israeli hasbara
(propaganda) campaign, there was a massive,
unprecedented public mobilization in Europe and
even in North America expressing outrage and
disgust.
Gaza will likely be seen as the turning point
when Israeli propaganda lost its power to
mystify, silence and intimidate as it has for so
long. Even the Nazi Holocaust, long deployed by
Zionists to silence Israel's critics, is
becoming a liability; once unimaginable
comparisons are now routinely heard. Jewish and
Palestinian academics likened Israel's actions
in Gaza to the Nazi massacre in the Warsaw
Ghetto. A Vatican cardinal referred to Gaza as a
"giant concentration camp." UK Member of
Parliament Gerald Kaufman, once a staunch
Zionist, told the House of Commons, "My
grandmother was ill in bed when the Nazis came
to her home town of Staszow, [Poland]. A German
soldier shot her dead in her bed." Kaufman
continued, "my grandmother did not die to
provide cover for Israeli soldiers murdering
Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza." He denounced
the Israeli military spokesperson's
justifications as the words "of a Nazi."
It wasn't only such statements, but the enormous
demonstrations, the nonviolent direct actions,
and the unprecedented expressions of support for
boycott, divestment and sanctions from major
trade unions in Italy, Canada and New Zealand.
An all-party group of city councillors in
Birmingham, Europe's second largest municipal
government, urged the UK government to follow
suit. Salma Yaqoub of the RESPECT Party
explained that "One of the factors that helped
bring an end to the brutal apartheid regime in
South Africa was international pressure for
economic, sporting and cultural boycotts. It is
time that Israel started to feel similar
pressure from world opinion."
Israel, its true nature as failed, brutal
colonial project laid bare in Gaza, is extremely
vulnerable to such a campaign. Little noticed
amidst the carnage in Gaza, Israel took another
momentous step towards formal apartheid when the
Knesset elections committee voted to ban Arab
parties from participating in upcoming
elections. Zionism, an ideology of racial
supremacy, extremism and hate, is a dying
project, in retreat and failing to find new
recruits. With enough pressure, and relatively
quickly, Israelis too would likely produce their
own de Klerk ready to negotiate a way out. Every
new massacre makes it harder, but a de-zionized,
decolonized, reintegrated Palestine affording
equal rights to all who live in it, regardless
of religion or ethnicity, and return for
refugees is not a utopian dream.
It is within reach, in our lifetimes. But it is
far from inevitable. We can be sure that Western
and Arab governments will continue to support
Israeli apartheid and Palestinian collaboration
under the guise of the "peace process" unless
decisively challenged. Israeli massacres will
continue and escalate until the nightmare of an
Israeli- style "peace" -- apartheid and further
ethnic cleansing -- is fulfilled.
The mobilizations of the past three weeks showed
that a different world is possible and within
our grasp if we support the boycott, divestment
and sanctions movement. Although they will never
get to see it, that world would be a fitting
memorial for all of Israel's victims.
Co-founder
of The Electronic Intifada, Ali Abunimah is
author of One Country:
A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian
Impasse (Metropolitan Books, 2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|